Archive for the ‘Subscribers Only’ Category

GASLAND – CAN YOU LIGHT YOUR WATER ON FIRE?

Sunday, January 9th, 2011

GASLAND, a documentary directed by Josh Fox, is a first person account of the filmmaker’s quest to discover what the impact might be of proposed natural gas drilling both on his own property in Northeastern Pennsylvania, and ultimately, current and past drilling in thirty-three other states. What he discovered is ruining the water supply in many places across the United States.

GASLAND has an advocacy and apocalyptic theme that can’t be ignored. The scary part is that the “end time” has already come to many parts of the country. Gas well drilling in thirty-four states, using hydraulic fracturing, is polluting the water table, making humans sick, killing wildlife and laying waste to the land.  “You need water for life,” says Josh Fox, in one sequence. The Federal Environmental Protection Agency and state agencies have been compromised by the natural gas industry and laws facilitated by Vice-President, Dick Cheney under the Bush Administration.

Gasland doesn’t speculate about these issues, it brings you face-to-face with the alarming actuality of elected officials influenced by natural gas industry lobbyists. In the opening scenes of the documentary a panel of industry representatives faces the Congressional “Sub-committee on Energy and Minerals.” It’s clear from the start of the hearings, which way the gas blows. The testimony is inter-cut with coverage of the environment and current gas drilling sites. The words and pictures tell different stories.

What makes this documentary interesting is that it’s a personal story of discovery for Josh Fox, the films director. He narrates much of the film beginning with his first encounter with the natural gas industry, when he receives an offer from a natural gas drilling company to lease his land to them for drilling. Based on his love for the environment he grew up in he begins to investigate what drilling on his land might mean despite the $100,000 dollar offer he has received.

The rest of the film is based on his travels across the country to drilling sites in twenty-four states. What he discovers is devastating, including tap water that is flammable! A long with Josh you get to meet individuals and families, all with stories concerning their well water before and after the hydraulic fracturing process used to free the natural gas from the shale 8000 feet below the surface. “Fracking,” as the process is called, blasts a mixture of more than 596 chemicals and water to fracture the rock releasing the gas. The documentary

doesn’t just voice complaints, it shows the problem and the results time after time.  If you’ve never seen water, from the tap and in streams, that can be lit with a match, you will see it in Gasland.

This documentary is much more than an environmental protection advocacy film. It is an account of the continuing rape of the land to produce natural gas. Hydraulic fracturing is a process that is causing long-term damage to the land and life in those areas where drilling has occurred. This film sounds an alarm that is hard to ignore.

Gasland has a point-of-view that is obvious, however, it does endeavor to present the industry claims that there has been no impact from the hydraulic fracture process. What no one in the industry wants to talk about is that the process uses a huge number of carcinogenic chemicals and enormous amounts of water. Much of the chemicals and water stay in the ground ultimately polluting the water table and the wells of nearby residents. Residents offer glasses of well water to company officials, who claim it is safe to drink, when they visit. The officials decline the offer.

The camera work is basic, handheld and from the filmmakers POV, but this “guerilla” style of documentary filmmaking gives the story the intimacy cinema verite offers. Obviously there is a second camera when we see Josh Fox shooting. Most of the documentary feels spontaneous. There is one dubious scene toward the end with a slide projected on a wall that seems more like homage to An Inconvenient Truth, than anything else. Editing is well paced.  The sound design, including banjo playing by Josh Fox is appropriate.

In a documentary in which you have a great deal of coverage, interviews and archival material gathered spontaneously in many cases, it’s important to find a way to structure the story so that it includes a beginning, middle, end, and conflict.   Gasland achieves this by developing parallel themes and creating some anticipation regarding the outcomes and even the validity of some of the claims made by the subjects interviewed, including the government and one company official.  Josh’s personal quest is paralleled with the experience of the people he meets. For the first twenty-three minutes of the documentary you wonder if there actually is tap water that’s flammable. These factors keep up interest and bring you into the story.

Reminiscent of films by Michael Moore, Gasland fits into the same genre as other personal advocacy documentaries where the filmmaker involves him or herself in the story. In many respects the technique feels like a nonfiction book in that it makes clear its point-of-view up-front. There are also a large amount of first person accounts and graphic examples of the results of natural gas drilling using hydraulic fracturing.

Josh Fox’s Gasland is a road trip of sorts, perhaps a preview of a possible trip through a hellish environment of the future. It’s an important advocacy documentary that should not be ignored.

JRMartin

_________________________________________________________

Trailer

HELVETICA - CHANGING THE WORLD, ONE LETTER AT A TIME...

Sunday, January 9th, 2011

The documentary HELVETICA’S appeal is that it explores a world of which you may not be fully aware. Signs, brochures, logos, billboards, street signs, directions, store names, product names and daily correspondence all use a variety of fonts but none more prevalent for the last fifty years than Helvetica.

HELVETICA is a documentary about a typeface. In a world of advocacy and activist documentary exposes, “Typefaces and Fonts” may at first seem a mundane subject; something meant for graphic designers and artists. Certainly this film will appeal to graphic artists, advertising and marketing professionals, anyone in these and other related areas that use typefaces. But today doesn’t everyone use typefaces or fonts? Word processing software programs offer a  variety of font choices for correspondence and corporate in-house communications. Which typefaces will communicate best for your purposes?

Using a traditional documentary format, director Gary Hustwit brings to life the amazing story of the Helvetica typeface.  At the same time he gives you a look into the rich tradition and thought that goes into designing a typeface. The documentary combines historical perspectives, and first person interviews with designers who both love and hate Helvetica. Who would have thought there could be all this angst about a type font! But there is, and this documentary helps you to understand why typefaces are important and how they impact the reader. Many of the designers interviewed are well known, candid and at times even humorous.

It doesn’t seem possible that anyone watching this documentary will ever be able to look a the world around them again without noticing how much Helvetica typeface is out there. The film incorporates scenes starting on the streets of New York and other cities, where suddenly it’s apparent how inundated you are with typefaces. Why did they choose Helvetica for the subway signs and directions in the New York subway? An interview with Massimo Vignelli gives his perspective of why he uses Helvetica.

The amazing world of graphic design and typefaces are explored in this surprising, fast paced, informative documentary. In the words of Manfred Schultz, “Type is saying things to us all the time… Typefaces express a mood and atmosphere. They give words a coloring.

The documentary is well shot and edited. Interviews with leading designers are brought to life with additional footage graphically explaining ideas and concepts. The sound design, including selection of music works well with the subject.

An excellent documentary to watch whether you are a graphic designer, in marketing or advertising, designing a brochure, newsletter, website or just like learning something new about the world we live in. Informative and entertaining.

JRMartin

Trailer

_______________________________________________

EXIT THROUGH THE GIFT SHOP – Satire often reveals more truth than reality.

Monday, December 27th, 2010

Exit Through The Gift Shop might be the documentary that begins where the 1982 documentary Style Wars, a film by Tony Silver and Henry Chalfont, ends. Thirty years later when graffiti has become internationally known as “street art,” not just a nuisance or vandalism.  In Style Wars the filmmakers set out to tell the story of graffiti artists in New York City, their battle with the city, NY Transit Authority and to some extent among themselves. Mayor Koch compares doing graffiti to murder!

In addition to the historical context there are a number of parallel themes shared between Style Wars and Exit Through The Gift Shop. There is a sociological connection regarding the unseen, unappreciated, outside the establishment part of society demanding to be heard and recognized.  Is graffiti a big scream that says, we are here, we are clever and if we choose to, we can create art or we can “spam” you! Another parallel is that “Exit” also looks at how all rebellions ultimately become, or get co-opted, by the establishment.

Exit, directed by Street Artist Banksy, begins with Thierry Guetta a Frenchman living in L A,  who runs a trendy clothing shop. Thierry carries a camcorder everywhere he goes and compulsively shoots whatever interests him. After visiting his family in France, Thierry discovers that his cousin is a graffiti artist there, known as Enforcer. His cousin knows Shepard Fairey, a well-established L A street artist. When Thierry returns from France he contacts Fairey who agrees to let Thierry go with him while he works. Thierry tells Shepard he’s making a documentary film about graffiti and street art. But Thierry has no idea how to make a documentary; he’s just into the recording of events and everything he sees that interests him. He has hundreds of tapes sitting in boxes.

Fairey introduces Thierry to Banksy. Banksy allows Thierry to tag along with him on some of his excursions in L A and England. While Banksy likes Thierry he finally discovers that Thierry doesn’t know how to make a documentary. Banksy decides to make a documentary about Thierry incorporating some of Thierry’s footage.

The result is the evolution of Thierry going from nutty guy with camera, to recording street artists at work, through his morphing into self styled street artist and entrepreneur. All of this against the backdrop of serious established street artists like Fairley and Banksy. This results in a pretty comprehensive look at the “street art” world in a few countries.

This film incorporates a number of approaches to documentary filmmaking. The footage that Thierry contributes is old school Direct Cinema, as “fly-on-the-wall” as you can get at times. Once Banksy gets involved there is a Cinema Verite activist approach combined with interviews, music and a third party narrator.

Exit Through the Gift Shop is entertaining and at the same time a candid look at what the Graffiti and Street Art movement has become. In many respects Banksy is holding up a mirror to himself, other Street Artists and the Art World about the commercialization of Art and Artists.

After seeing a ninety-minute cut of Thierry’s attempt to make a documentary out of his random footage, Banksy suggests to Thierry that maybe he should go home and try doing some street art himself, according to Banksy, never dreaming what Thierry would end up doing.

As in all documentary efforts you have to wonder how much the filmmakers facilitated the story by even their mere presence. How much did Banksy enable Thierry to recreate himself as a Street Artist?  This is something one may ever know.  As a documentary filmmaker you go where the story takes you.

Exit Through The Gift Shop is well worth spending some time watching. It’s an independent documentary with a story to tell.  It is sociological and  anthropological to some extent.  Edited and paced well; an entertaining night out with Street Artists. And when the dawn comes up, an illuminated glimpse into the contemporary commercial art world.

From a purist documentary standpoint one might consider the implications that come to mind, in that there must be a contractual/financial agreement between Banksy, Thierry and perhaps Fairey. This contract might give everyone a financial interest in the documentary, after all there is Thierry’s footage in the film. Some sort of buyout is a possibility. This contract would probably give Banksy “creative control,” of the film. It also might provide for everyone keeping Banksy’s identity secret. As nutty as Thierry may appear he isn’t slow when it comes to money. Banksy having creative control would give him the space to make a serious documentary.

The Exit Through The Gift Shop DVD comes with some post cards, stickers and a pair of 2D glasses that may add a couple more spectral dimensions to looking out the window while screening the film. Satire, with a few ironic twists, often reveals more truth than reality.

J R Martin - Author: Create Documentary Films, Videos and Multimedia

_____________________________________________________________

Theatrical Trailer UK Banksy

NADJA SALERNO–SONNENBERG SPEAKING IN STRINGS -- Fragmented Glimpses Into The World Of A Famous Violinist

Saturday, December 25th, 2010

One difficult thing about making a portrait or profile documentary is turning it into an interesting story about the person or subject being documented.  Nadja Salerno–Sonnenberg is an extremely talented, and accomplished violinist. Her style of performance is aggressive and filled with the emotion she feels coming from the music. Her approach to performing is somewhat controversial. This sounds like someone you want to know more about. Certainly a documentary about this talented woman, her life and music should make for an enlightening experience.

Documentaries, like any form of storytelling, must tell a story. A story with a basic concept and beginning, middle and end. The test of a successful documentary is that it takes actuality; structures it in a storytelling format that both informs and at times entertains. There are subjects that are difficult to find entertaining but if you can walk away with a feeling that watching it was a meaningful learning experience, the documentary is successful.

There are moments in Speaking With Strings when Nadja Salerno-Sonnenberg is performing that are captivating. To a fan or anyone who appreciates the violin this may make the film worth watching. There are moments when her witty personality and her vulnerability are felt. There are emotional moments in her life that are glimpsed. Unfortunately all these moments do not add up to a cohesive story. There’s a superficial quality to the entire documentary, as if the real Nadja Salerno-Sonnenberg is not being revealed.

Directed by Paola Di Florio, a childhood friend, this film focuses an assemblage of clips of Salerno-Sonnenberg’s apparently dysfunctional life. You have to wonder how much of a friend, Di Florio, really is? After some photographs of Nadja, with voiceover comments about some vague problems with a gun; the documentary opens with Nadja in a hot air balloon telling us she believes in God! This is followed by some performance shots with some voice over. Then suddenly, there’s a shot of Nadja standing behind a tree, maybe waiting for a cue to walk out, which she does. She assembles some found objects in a field, then makes-up some funny faux symbolism about the parts. This scene comes off as contrived and meaningless.

A documentary portrait obviously must look at the entire person, for better or worse, but what is most interesting about a virtuoso violinist is her music. Nadja’s passion for music and the violin is apparent but not really dealt with in a way that goes beyond close-ups of her contorting her face as she plays. Where do those expressions come from? What does she feel about what she is playing at those moments? Pain? Joy? Fear? Agony? All of the above?

This documentary doesn’t appear to have a focus. It tries to create anticipation regarding Nadja’s suicide attempt but this comes-off as a “device” that trivializes her bouts with depression and her suicide attempt. It’s almost as if Di Florio tried to make Nadja appear as a spoiled diva.

There’s nothing wrong with a documentary having drama that stems from actuality and that fits into the story. When watching a documentary about a violinist like Salerno-Sonnenberg, what are you most interested in? Her work? Her creativity? How she got to where she is now? What’s unique about her style of playing? Discovering her personality and life behind the scenes?  Seeing and hearing her perform? There are bits and pieces, fragments that address these issues patched together in this film, but they do not tell a story. What is it you are supposed to learn from these random clips of Nadja Salerno-Sonnenberg’s activities?

In Speaking With Strings there seems to be a focus on everything dysfunctional with clips of performance edited in between interviews. Once in awhile Nadja’s humor, dedication to her craft, work ethic, and personality are revealed ,but ultimately drowned out by lack of context. Nadja Salerno-Sonnenberg’s “life story” would have made a great documentary but Speaking In Strings, is a documentary that is  “Speaking In Tongues,” that are difficult to comprehend.

There are times when the film appears ready to end but doesn’t. Maybe, the director Di Florio, should have considered structuring the documentary narrative along the lines of some of the compositions Nadja performs. A beginning, middle and end with movements that tell us a story that truly speaks to us. Instead the end of the movie is all about her attempted suicide as if that is the climax to her accomlishments.  Was the making of the documentary one big therapy session for Nadja to resolve this crisis in her life? Perhaps she now knows how she got to that point and where she wants to go, but this information is not shared with the audience.

Nadja Salerno-Sonneberg life experience and music must have a lot more to offer than what was portrayed in Speaking In Strings.

JRMartin

_________________________________________________

Trailer not available at this time.


RIDING GIANTS - AN EXCITING EXPLORATION AND HISTORY OF BIG WAVE SURFING

Sunday, December 19th, 2010

Whether you love surfing or wonder what its all about Riding Giants takes you on an amazing journey. Huge waves, accompanied by the sound of the ocean and music, curl across the screen transporting you into the realm of big wave surfing. Here you meet surfing legends past and present including Tom Blake, Greg Noll, Jeff Clark and others who were there in the 1950’s and 60’s; then on to the present with Laird Hamilton.   This is not “just another surfing movie.” Stacy Peralta has a created a documentary that is historical, informative and visually entertaining. It’s a story told from the inside looking out.

Riding Giants looks at the history of big wave surfing beginning with its thousand-year old roots in Hawaii. A short, humorous graphic summary updates you on the first thousand years, beginning on the beaches of Hawaii where Calvinist missionaries banned the indigenous sport for many years until an entrepreneurial promoter came along. He saw the potential to attract tourists, and resurrected the pastime.

Riding Giants includes archival footage, shot by surfers in the early days, that captures the “surfing lifestyle” of the young men who trekked to Hawaii in search of big waves.  The footage is edited with music, effects, interviews with knowledgeable experts, and the surfers themselves. The documentary gives you the feeling you have traveled back in time to the California beaches where modern American surfing culture blossomed.

But the real story of big wave surfing begins with the migration of surfers to Makaha beach on the North Shore in Hawaii, where once again Peralta introduces unique archival photographs and footage shot by Greg Noll and others.  A great deal of research and effort went into locating individuals who had photographs and film of the fifties and sixties in Hawaii.

The use of  film and photographs shot by the people who were there  is important because it establishes and documents surfing subculture in a first person context. This brings aspects of the  direct cinema, “fly-on-the-wall” style of documentary storytelling to the film. In addition the restored film footage has a tactile feel that seems appropriate aesthetically.  Riding Giants is definitely not Gidget’s or Frankie Avalon’s Hollywood version of surfing. It’s interesting to note that much of this early footage appears to have been shot on small 16 millimeter or 8 millimeter film cameras of the day. Once again attesting to how lightweight portable recording equipment facilitated modern documentary filmmaking.

In many ways the editing and pacing of Riding Giants matches the rhythm and movement of the ocean. There’s wave after wave of action as new beaches with bigger waves are discovered and brief moments of calm when you hear from those who have actually ridden the big waves. The thrill of riding a twenty-five foot wave at Waimea Bay on the North Shore in Hawaii is a shared experience.  Riding Giants uses music, effects, interviews and narration in an inventive fashion bringing the existence and emotions experienced by the surfers to the screen. Peralta employs time appropriate music for each period of history and original music by Matter for the score. Effects like waves and the ocean ambience complement the track.

Leaving Hawaii for a time, Riding Giants travels back to Northern California and a surfing location known as Mavericks at Half Moon Bay, twenty miles from San Francisco. Jeff Clark, then a local resident, discovered Mavericks when he was a teenager. This amazing big wave beach has waves that break a half-mile off shore then sweep along until they crash on dangerous jagged rocks. It becomes clear in these scenes that surfing is not just about riding big waves. It’s also about the challenge of conquering the elements and achieving your personal best. Some of the pros and cons regarding using a leash while surfing are looked at in this sequence.

The final scenes of the film look at the challenges and career of Laird Hamilton as he takes on bigger waves, using new and creative methods to get to where the big waves break. The giant waves encountered in this spectacular footage bring you up to date on the current trends in big wave surfing including retrieving the surfers.

Riding Giants is a documentary exploration of big wave surfing, as a sport and/or a pastime. It shows that surfing can be addictive for a number of reasons. In some cases it may be the thrill of conquering and riding a wave. At other times being one with nature may be the attraction. For some it’s a way of life. Whatever the motivation might be, Riding Giants opens up that universe from a historical and cultural perspective while also presenting great entertainment. Stay ‘till the end, watch all the credits and wait for a few last words from Greg Noll.

JRMartin – Author Create Documentary Films, Videos and Multimedia

Theatrical Trailer

THE LAST WALTZ - THE BAND - SCORSESE

Sunday, December 12th, 2010

Asked about working on The Last Waltz, Martin Scorsese said, “it was a joy, it was celebration, it was extraordinary inspiration listening to this music.” To many there will never be another band like “THE BAND!” In 1976 Scorsese was asked to make a documentary of The Band’s last performance.

After 16 years of backing names like Bobby Dylan, and performing on their own The Band was set to do their last concert.  THE LAST WALTZ concert could have been simply an event documentary, or an archival recording of the actual concert. But once Martin Scorsese became involved it became much more.

The Last Waltz is one of the best concert or musical documentaries ever made.   It became a musical documentary when it went beyond simply recording the performance. The Last Waltz transcends the concert event category by inter-cutting interviews with the members of the band talking about their experiences and why after “sixteen years on the road,” Robbie Robertson feels “it’s an impossible way of life.” The interview segments are skillfully blended with the performance footage to give you a sense of how these musicians got to this point in their careers. In dramatic terms, it is the back-story to The Last Waltz documentary.

One of the highlights of the film are the guest appearances of a host of well know musicians and singers including Ronnie Hawkins, DR. John, Neil Young, The Staples, Neil Diamond, Joni Mitchell, Paul Butterfield, Muddy Waters, Erik Clapton, Emmylou Harris, Van Morrison, Bob Dylan, Ringo Starr and Ron Wood of the Rolling Stones. All looking thirty-four years younger then they would today!

There’s an intimate feel to the entire affair. A family of musicians and friends who have come together to celebrate Rock and Roll, their own music and this last concert of The Band. Many of these musicians worked with The Band on the road.  The Band worked with Bobby Dylan when he made the transition from folk music to rock. The camaraderie these musicians share is typified when the guest performers come on stage at the end of the show, to sing Bob Dylan’s “I shall be released” together.

Best known for Taxi Driver, at this point in his career, Scorsese had also made a couple documentary films, Street Scene in 1970 and Italian American in 1974. Scorsese decided that he wanted to shoot this concert in 35mm, “like a movie.” To move the production beyond simply recording archival footage, he brought in Art Director Boris Levin to create a set for the Winterland concert hall in San Francisco.  In order to bring Levin’s designs to life Scorsese borrowed the set from La Traviata including three large chandeliers that were hung over the stage. The entire venue became a set with lighting and a distinct look and feel.  Robbie Robertson says that when the lights came up that night there was an audible gasp from the packed hall.

The Last Waltz is beautifully lit and shot.  Credit for the lighting and cinematography goes to a large number of individuals. Director of Photography/Camera Operators included Vilmos Zsigmon, Laslo Kovacs, David Myers,  Bobby Byrne, Michale Watkins, Hiro Narita, and Camera Operators Fred Schuler, Joe Marquette, Ray J. DelaMtte and Sean Doyle. In one scene Laslo Kovacs saved the day by shooting and covering the performance of Muddy Waters while everyone else had accidentally gone on break. David Myers did handheld camera on the stage and is responsible for some great close-ups during the performances. Hiro Narita on a jib or track getting higher angles.

The subjective layer of sets and lighting adds the filmmaker’s point-of-view to documentary. It helps to interpret the event. Scorsese did not tell the performers what to play or how to work. He shot the concert as it happened. He did do elaborate preproduction planning about how he and his crew would cover the performances based on what numbers The Band said they would perform. Scorsese did a multi-column  shooting script with a storyboard and camera plot diagrams included, so that all the camera operators would know what to shoot. In addition to the concert hall venue Scorsese shot several additional numbers on a stage after the event. In these he was able to use a crane to get a different perspective and feel to the music and performers. Lighting felt as though it was done to complement the Winterland lighting.

The line between fiction and actuality is often a gray one. Scorsese’s introduction of a set and subjective lighting doesn’t add a fictional aspect to the documentary. It simply enhances environment in which the actuality of the concert occurs, helping to illuminate the subject.

The Last Waltz, directed by Martin Scorsese, is a documentary that is more than nostalgic archival concert footage and interviews. For those who lived through those years it is a journey back to a unique time. To other generations it is an entertaining musical history documentary that, as the opening graphic suggests, should be “PLAYED LOUD!”

JRMartin, Author Create Documentary Films, Videos and Multimedia

________________________________________________________

THE FOG OF WAR - ELEVEN LESSONS FROM THE LIFE OF ROBERT S MCNAMARA

Monday, December 6th, 2010

The Fog Of War – Eleven Lessons From The Life Of Robert S. McNamara is more than lessons about the cruelty of war. McNamara and director Errol Morris explore issues surrounding war, including the mindset, ethics, politics and mistakes made in US policy decisions during the life of Robert S. McNamara. The documentary begins with a montage of war scenes and film credits, set to original music by Philip Glass. Soon Robert S. McNamara, former Secretary of Defense, under President Kennedy and President Johnson, is seen sitting in what appears to be a sound recording booth talking to Errol Morris who is heard off camera conducting the conversation.  What follows is an amazing, insightful story built around the life experience of McNamara, who was born in San Francisco, California at the end of the first World War.

McNarmara, at eighty-five, “remembers the sentence where he left off,” as he apparently resumes the interview/conversation, after first asking Morris for a sound check of Morris’s voice. Secretary McNamara definitely wants to be in charge and states he “knows exactly what I [he] wanted to say.” What he has to say is important and comes from a lifetime of learning and experience. It is well worth hearing this first hand account of recent history and what this man has experienced and learned.

In this Academy Award wining documentary, director Errol Morris, with help of editors Karen Schmeer, Doug Abel and Chyld King, takes this intimate conversation and brings it to life with archival footage, effects and music that complements McNamara’s story. In what serves as an introduction to the eleven lessons, McNamara states that he is “at an age where can look back and derive some conclusions about my actions. My rule has been, try to learn, try to understand what happened, develop the lessons and pass them on…” The documentary is structured in such away that McNamara is able to convey insight in to the areas he has experienced and learned from.

McNamara includes information about his career, personal history and controversial background. As the documentary progresses McNamara ties in his past to events that influenced him. This gives you a sense of who he is and what he has experienced to bring him to these conclusions. Morris uses the conversation with McNamara to narrate the documentary. Talking to Morris, McNamara looks directly at the camera. On several of occasions we hear an exchange or question between Morris and McNamara.

Lesson # 1: Empathize with your enemy, deals with the Cuban missile crisis of October, 1962, revealing how close the US was to nuclear war and how war was avoided by understanding the Russian, Cuban and US mindset. How close the US came to war with Russia is dramatically portrayed, as only someone who was there, in the war, room could tell it.

Unlike other films by Errol Morris this film stays in the nonfiction documentary category with no reenactments. It is dramatic and informative using McNamara’s words and extensive use of strong archival footage.  In some ways this is similar to the style Ken Burns uses in his documentaries. But Morris uses music more dramatically and editorially than Burns, bringing out some of the tension inherent in the archival footage and McNamara’s voice over. In addition to McNamara, dialog from individuals heard in the archival footage is used. For example audio conversations between John F. Kennedy and his advisors is used during the Cuban Missile Crisis sequences. Later, during the Viet Nam War, Lyndon Johnson is heard in a number of taped recordings.

Each lesson is another exploration of the history of the US up to the Viet Nam war and McNamara’s departure as Secretary of Defense under President Johnson. There are also reflections by McNamara on the first and second World Wars, and Korea. The subjective point-of view is McNamara’s but it appears to be considered and reflective in a very forthcoming fashion. Beyond the documentation of war McNamara talks about the moral and ethical considerations he and others have faced. He examines the resulting mistakes made based on misinformation and wrong thinking. McNamara originated the idea of “Policy Analysis in his role as Secretary of Defense.

The Fog Of War, as a documentary is significant from a historical, political,  cultural and educational perspective.  This documentary may offer support for the notion that those who do not learn from the past are doomed to repeat the same mistakes over and over.

Robert S. McNamara – June 9, 1916 – July 6, 2009

JRMartin

__________________________________________

THEATRICAL TRAILER

SKETCHES OF FRANK GEHRY

Tuesday, November 30th, 2010

A documentary exploring the artistic creative process might choose a number of approaches, but none more intimate and revealing than in Sketches of Frank Gehry, a film by Sydney Pollack. Sketches of Frank Gehry may be the only documentary Pollack directed in his long career as a filmmaker, but because of his willingness to experiment, take risks and to “try to understand,” he was able to create an intimate portrait of Frank Gehry.  At the same time, Pollack brought to life insights into the inventiveness shared by artists in many disciplines including film. Anyone who is an artist or aspires to work in a creative artistic discipline will find this documentary insightful and inspiring.

SKETCHES OF FRANK GEHRY – 2006 – 84 minutes Directed by Sydney Pollack, Film Editor Karen Schmeer A.C.E,  Original Music by Sorman & Nystrom – Sony Pictures Classics Release

“Frank seems to live in the moment – creativity lives in the moment –  [Frank] takes an idea that someone says and finds out what they’re about and what they think they want; and then suddenly he’s creating it!” –Dennis Hopper in the film.

Watching this documentary makes you want to travel around the world to see all of Gehry’s work. Which is what it should do since his work is so intriguing. But the documentary is much more than a tour of buildings because it takes you on a journey of discovery and exploration of both architecture and the inventive methods Gehry uses to design his structures.

Sydney Pollack said in an interview, “that even though he was a friend of Frank Gehry, he knew very little about architecture”. Pollack said he went into the project “trying to understand what it’s like to do this (be an architect and design buildings like Gehry’s).” Because of his wanting to know why, Pollack quickly reveals  that  the creative process is, in many respects, a universal one.

Gehry begins developing his ideas by sketching them. Wavy lines that show how he visualizes the shape of the building he’s working on. These lines in other disciplines might be the first dabs of paint on a canvas, words on a piece of paper or pre-visualization of a scene in a film.  Squiggly lines are the beginning of a process that ultimately gives birth, with all the associated pain and joy, to something new and original.

A serious documentary is an exploration of actuality, with the outcome, that everyone, the filmmaker, the subject and the audience learns something new about the reality presented and perhaps themselves. Sketches of Frank Gehry accomplishes this goal on a number of levels, by using spontaneous interviews with the subject and others, action footage of the work in progress, and montage sequences of finished work.  Pollack interviews friends, fans and detractors of Gehry’s work.

Gehry is interviewed in his studio by Pollack, who made this film over a five-year period. He also appears in the film doing the interviews.  Pollack is seen holding a small video camera that he appears to be using to do the interview. While some shots from that camera may have been used in the film, there are cinematographers, one other video photographer and an audio mixer listed in the credits. The audio does not sound like it was recorded on the camera microphone. Pollack emphatically states that he did not want to be seen in the film, but as it turns out he is really a part of the story. Not only as Gehry’s friend, and facilitator of the conversation, but also bringing you into Gehry’s world and his architecture. The little Cannon GL1 Pollack uses feels like a prop at times. Perhaps, for Pollack, it was a reminder that he was making a documentary, or a symbol of cinematic truth, as it was used in Vertov’s,  1929 classic, Man With The Movie Camera.

One of the most revealing scenes in the story is an interview done in Gehry’s car as he drives around LA. He talks about his life and many of the decisions he made on the way to finding himself and realizing the type of architecture he wanted to produce. He broke with traditional architectural concepts and became, instead, an artistic architect. Mildred Friedman speaking of Frank Gehry in the film says, “he’s an artist –he takes so many risks – and that’s what artist do. Artists take risks to do something new that know one has seen before.”

There is wonderful footage of many of Gehry’s most well know buildings including the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao, Spain, finished in 1997. This amazing architectural wonder has transformed the city of Bilbao, while at the same time; somehow, appearing that it has been there all along. The structure seems to be both art and architecture.

In making Sketches of Frank Gehry, Pollack has shed light on the constant struggles that most inventive artistic people experience as they go through life. Pollack has taken Frank Gehry, his work and cinematically transformed it all as a mirror, much like Gehry does with the surfaces of his buildings, to reflect much about the human creative experience.

Sydney Irwin Pollack (July 1, 1934 – May 26, 2008)

JRMartin

__________________________________________________________

Theatrical Trailer

THE COVE - 2009 Academy Award Winner Best Feature Documentary

Monday, November 22nd, 2010

“Driving into the town of Taiji [Japan] is like driving into the twilight zone,”   says Ric O’Barry, disguised in a hat, dark glasses and a filter mask.  Ric and  his passenger are driving into the town. “A little town with a big secret,” Rick continues, “when you look around you would think they loved dolphins and whales.” His passenger is Louie Psihoyos, Co-founder, Oceanic Preservation Society and the director of THE COVE – 2009 – 96 minutes – Winner Academy Award Best Feature Documentary 2009.  Directed by Louie Psihoyos – Oceanic Preservation Society, Lionsgate Distributor, Music J Ralph.

The town of Taiji resembles a resort town, with whales and dolphins as its theme. A whale and dolphin museum, performances, rides in boats shaped like dolphins and statues celebrating these aquatic mammals. But you have to wonders if there is more here than meets the eye? Especially while browsing though the museum shop, where dolphin meat is sold. Watch the dolphins perform and then eat them!

The Cove is a documentary with an activist point-of-view. The filmmakers set out to discover what happens to dolphins captured by the fisherman of Taiji, Japan. One of the main proponents for dolphins is Ric O’Barry, once the costar, with Flipper the dolphin, of Flipper, the television show that basically started the worlds preoccupation with performing dolphins. There is some archival footage of the show used in the documentary. When the show ended Ric became interested in how these creatures, who he discovered have “self recognition,” were being treated in captivity. Ric became an activist after one of the dolphins that played Flipper died suddenly. He has since gone to many different countries setting dolphins free or bringing them back to the wild.

The documentary looks at the many aspects of human and dolphin interaction over the centuries. It becomes clear that these marine mammals have a culture of their own. They communicate and use sound in more sophisticated ways than any sonar system man has invented. The scenes of dolphins riding the waves with surfers and the stories told by surfers of their interaction with dolphins are amazing. The film makes a strong case for humane treatment of dolphins and whales. Japan has steadfastly refused to stop hunting whales and dolphins.

In the documentary you learn that every year, from September to March, thousands of dolphins are herded in to the shore in Taiji where the best ones are sold to Sea World and other attraction operators for as much as $150,000 each. Taiji is the largest supplier of dolphins to marine parks and swim with dolphin programs around the world. The fisherman in Taiji herd the dolphins into the beach as they migrate in open water. Using long pipes, that they bang on, the fisherman create a wall of sound that scares the dolphins toward the shore.

The secret about Taiji revealed is that dolphins who don’t make the cut are slaughtered and sold for food, even though they have a very high concentration of Mercury and are not fit for consumption.   Selling the meat in one town in Japan caused serious birth defects and other problems for children. An estimated 23,000 dolphins are killed in Japan each year.

The capture and sale of dolphins to trainers is done in plain site. But the slaughter is done in a hidden cove where the filmmakers were not allowed to film. The filmmakers were aware in advance that they would not be permitted to shoot. Louie Psihoyos and the production crew had a number of special cameras and camera housings made beforehand so that they could go undercover to shoot certain scenes needed for the documentary.

Part of the story covers the filmmaker’s preparation and execution of the their plan to film what goes on in the hidden cove. This meant using covert methods to loose their police tail and  to deploy hidden cameras in the areas they wanted to film. The hidden cameras worked well and revealed the absolutely brutal mass killing of the dolphins in the bloody water of the cove.

Among the high tech cameras used were thermal imaging cameras, and night vision cameras. Some cameras were hidden in housings made for them by Industrial Light and Magic. These included the “Nest Cam, The Rock Cam and The Blood Cam, an underwater housing. In addition a model helicopter outfitted with a camera was used with a remote control to fly over the cove. The documentary opening titles use some of the thermal imaging camera scenes.

From the time they arrive the filmmakers and Ric O’Barry are followed and questioned by Japanese government security. Part of the documentary shows the crew setting up the various hidden cameras while government security is nearby searching for them.

This documentary is both an activist and nature documentary produced by advocates with the specific goal of bringing to light what they believe is the inhumane treatment of mammals who are being brutally slaughtered and as Ric OBarry claims, “enslaved.” Its point-of-view is clear and the footage does not lie. It shows as fact what the filmmakers claim is happening. In addition there are interviews with Japanese officials and footage from meeting of the International Whaling Commission annual meeting, where Japan dominates proceedings by basically bribing other countries into supporting their whaling and dolphin industry. In one scene the Japanese representative claims the dolphins are pests that eat fish the Japanese need for food. He also claims that the dolphins instantly with no pain.

The Cove is a well-made advocacy documentary  that uses investigative techniques to expose cruelty and unnecessary slaughter of marine life. It is difficult to watch at times because of the treatment of the dolphins, but it makes the viewer aware, perhaps painfully aware, of the problem.

JRMartin

_________________________________________________


HARLAN COUNTY USA

Monday, November 15th, 2010

A coal miner silhouetted and barely visible in the darkness of a coal mine calls out a warning three times, “fireinthehole,” the words all run together melodiously,  letting all know he’s about to detonate an explosion. So begins HARLAN COUNTY USA, 1976, 104 minutes Directed by Barbara Kopple, Winner Academy Award for Best Feature Documentary 1976. DVD Criterion Collection

Harlan County USA begins in the mine with the coal miners; the work they do and the environment they work in. Dark, damp, dusty, cold, cramped spaces, underground where an accident can cost everyone their lives. The camera goes with the miners as they are taken into the mine lying down on a conveyer belt, the roof of the shaft inches from their heads. You are with the miners as they crawl through tunnels and mine the coal. The processed coal makes its way on another conveyer belt to the surface and the light long before the miners who will spend their day in the shadows.

If you had to pick one of the most important social documentaries made in America at any time Harlan County USA would be at the top of the list. This documentary is the story of coal miners and their families trying to achieve better wages. It’s also the story of working people demanding to be treated with dignity and respect. It’s the struggle of people living in run down shacks, in a company town in 1976 with no running water or indoor plumbing in rural Kentucky, and it’s the story of women making their voices heard.

After the coal miners at Brookside voted to join the United Mine Workers (UMW) the Duke Power Company, owners of the mine, refused to accept the contract with the union, so the workers went on strike. Duke Power Company then attempts to bust the union and intimidate the workers with violence. This was not the first time workers had rebelled against the coal mine owners. There are scenes in the documentary using archival footage that show previous strikes and some of the history of the area.

The notion of people striking for better wages and working conditions is important but what makes this story unique is the fact that the wives of the miners decide to take an active role in the process. In this Kentucky version of “women’s liberation” the women don’t burn their bras. Instead one woman, Lois Scott uses her bra to also carry a gun.  Since any restrictions on the number of picketers applies to the workers, she and other women start working the picket line to support their husbands and the strike. Things get tense on the picket line with both camps armed.

Early in the documentary Carl Horn, President of Duke Power Company, is seen claiming to have made the workers dozens of offers that have been turned down. The workers want a union contract. An official from Duke Power is asked if the company keeps workers in houses with no water and no indoor plumbing. He answers yes, but that they are working on getting them some trailers. Other individuals with anti-union sentiments are also interviewed.

Initially the coal miners and their families do not trust Barbara Kopple and her crew. Once the filmmakers’ demonstrate that they intend to record the actual facts of the situation they are accepted by the miners. However, this does not apply to the thugs hired by the mine company and led by a well known strike buster named Basil Collins. Collins drives or walks around brandishing a 45-caliber pistol hanging out of his pocket or on the seat of his pickup as he leads a convoy of cars with strike breakers (“scabs”) down the road to the mine area.

One night, out on the picket line, Collins and his thugs, who are obviously out to hurt or possibly kill Kopple, attack the film crew. Kopple is the focus of the attack. The filmmakers’ fight back but it’s the coal miner’s wives who come to the rescue. The filmmakers’ manage to get a warrant for Collins arrest.   The sheriff, in one scene of the film serves the warrant.

Making this documentary required being on location for many months. The documentary style is a mixture of observer, interviews and cinema verite activist. This is not the nightly news with some false notion of objectivity. The documentary has a POV that is from a humanistic perspective. The plight of these Americans, living in third world conditions, and being denied their constitutional rights by the mining company is certainly a cause worth advocating.

Because the filmmakers identify with the  the miners and are drawn into events, to some extent the filmmakers become a catalyst to what happens at these events. It’s clear that the mine company and others are intimidated by the fact that their activities and the attacks on the miners are being filmed. In some ways the workers and their families may have felt enabled by the film crew being there and being empathetic to their problems. The filmmakers allow the viewer to see into lives of the miners, their families and the reality of Harlan county. To accomplish this Kopple needed to gain the confidence of the miners and their families.

From scenes of strikers and state police confronting each other to the meetings of strong women supporting the strikers. Harlan County USA is a real life drama observed, recorded and edited in to a powerful statement that meets the criteria of what a documentary should be. This is a must see documentary for anyone interested in making documentaries or learning about the history of America.

JRMartin

_____________________________________________

US TRAILER FOR HARLAN COUNTY USA


  • Follow Us

    Subscribe to my feed
    Subscribe to my feed
    Subscribe to my feed
    Subscribe to my feed
    Subscribe to my feed
    Subscribe to my feed
  • Resources