advertisement for intimacy retreats

Archive for December, 2010

EXIT THROUGH THE GIFT SHOP – Satire often reveals more truth than reality.

Monday, December 27th, 2010

Exit Through The Gift Shop might be the documentary that begins where the 1982 documentary Style Wars, a film by Tony Silver and Henry Chalfont, ends. Thirty years later when graffiti has become internationally known as “street art,” not just a nuisance or vandalism.  In Style Wars the filmmakers set out to tell the story of graffiti artists in New York City, their battle with the city, NY Transit Authority and to some extent among themselves. Mayor Koch compares doing graffiti to murder!

In addition to the historical context there are a number of parallel themes shared between Style Wars and Exit Through The Gift Shop. There is a sociological connection regarding the unseen, unappreciated, outside the establishment part of society demanding to be heard and recognized.  Is graffiti a big scream that says, we are here, we are clever and if we choose to, we can create art or we can “spam” you! Another parallel is that “Exit” also looks at how all rebellions ultimately become, or get co-opted, by the establishment.

Exit, directed by Street Artist Banksy, begins with Thierry Guetta a Frenchman living in L A,  who runs a trendy clothing shop. Thierry carries a camcorder everywhere he goes and compulsively shoots whatever interests him. After visiting his family in France, Thierry discovers that his cousin is a graffiti artist there, known as Enforcer. His cousin knows Shepard Fairey, a well-established L A street artist. When Thierry returns from France he contacts Fairey who agrees to let Thierry go with him while he works. Thierry tells Shepard he’s making a documentary film about graffiti and street art. But Thierry has no idea how to make a documentary; he’s just into the recording of events and everything he sees that interests him. He has hundreds of tapes sitting in boxes.

Fairey introduces Thierry to Banksy. Banksy allows Thierry to tag along with him on some of his excursions in L A and England. While Banksy likes Thierry he finally discovers that Thierry doesn’t know how to make a documentary. Banksy decides to make a documentary about Thierry incorporating some of Thierry’s footage.

The result is the evolution of Thierry going from nutty guy with camera, to recording street artists at work, through his morphing into self styled street artist and entrepreneur. All of this against the backdrop of serious established street artists like Fairley and Banksy. This results in a pretty comprehensive look at the “street art” world in a few countries.

This film incorporates a number of approaches to documentary filmmaking. The footage that Thierry contributes is old school Direct Cinema, as “fly-on-the-wall” as you can get at times. Once Banksy gets involved there is a Cinema Verite activist approach combined with interviews, music and a third party narrator.

Exit Through the Gift Shop is entertaining and at the same time a candid look at what the Graffiti and Street Art movement has become. In many respects Banksy is holding up a mirror to himself, other Street Artists and the Art World about the commercialization of Art and Artists.

After seeing a ninety-minute cut of Thierry’s attempt to make a documentary out of his random footage, Banksy suggests to Thierry that maybe he should go home and try doing some street art himself, according to Banksy, never dreaming what Thierry would end up doing.

As in all documentary efforts you have to wonder how much the filmmakers facilitated the story by even their mere presence. How much did Banksy enable Thierry to recreate himself as a Street Artist?  This is something one may ever know.  As a documentary filmmaker you go where the story takes you.

Exit Through The Gift Shop is well worth spending some time watching. It’s an independent documentary with a story to tell.  It is sociological and  anthropological to some extent.  Edited and paced well; an entertaining night out with Street Artists. And when the dawn comes up, an illuminated glimpse into the contemporary commercial art world.

From a purist documentary standpoint one might consider the implications that come to mind, in that there must be a contractual/financial agreement between Banksy, Thierry and perhaps Fairey. This contract might give everyone a financial interest in the documentary, after all there is Thierry’s footage in the film. Some sort of buyout is a possibility. This contract would probably give Banksy “creative control,” of the film. It also might provide for everyone keeping Banksy’s identity secret. As nutty as Thierry may appear he isn’t slow when it comes to money. Banksy having creative control would give him the space to make a serious documentary.

The Exit Through The Gift Shop DVD comes with some post cards, stickers and a pair of 2D glasses that may add a couple more spectral dimensions to looking out the window while screening the film. Satire, with a few ironic twists, often reveals more truth than reality.

J R Martin - Author: Create Documentary Films, Videos and Multimedia

_____________________________________________________________

Theatrical Trailer UK Banksy

STYLE WARS

Monday, December 27th, 2010

Style Wars is a documentary that looks at graffiti “writers,” “bombers” and “taggers” in New York City starting in the 1970’s. It sees graffiti, or “street art,” (a more recent development) as part of a three-part hip-hop movement that includes, graffiti as the written word, rap as the spoken word, and acrobatic break dancing as the physical manifestation.

The 1982 documentary Style Wars, a film by Tony Silver and Henry Chalfont approaches the subject of graffiti as a social phenomenon. In Style Wars the filmmakers set out to tell the story of graffiti artists in New York City, their battle with the City, NY Transit Authority and to some extent among themselves.

In addition to the historical context there are a number of parallel themes developed in Style Wars. There is a sociological connection regarding the unseen, unappreciated, outside the establishment part of the society demanding to be heard and recognized.

Any conversation regarding this documentary must begin with the opening of the film. New York subway trains emerge out of the darkness to Wagner, a scene which ends with a transition to hip-hop music and the streets of New York City. The graffiti on the trains emerges out of the darkness along with the trains; an inventive opening to a documentary that manages to give you a look into the social and cultural aspects that rise from the exploration of this subculture.

In an interview with the Ed Koch Mayor of New York, Koch abstractly compares doing graffiti with murder! He also expresses concern about “the quality of life” for New Yorkers. He feels the graffiti writers are “destroying our life style and making it difficult to enjoy life.” As a subway rider himself the Mayor apparently did not enjoy looking at the graffiti, so he declared war on the “writers.” The writers retaliated with a “Dump Koch” bomb on the side of a train!

From a number of perspectives, Style Wars explores the reality of the graffiti writers, who do both tagging [leaving your sign] and “bombing” spraying artwork on trains and buildings. These are mostly young creative kids from the projects and working class neighborhoods, who are of many different ethnic and racial backgrounds. They all seem to have a need to rebel against authority and let others know they are around.

Henry Chalfont, one of the filmmakers, on arriving in New York City, was taken with the graffiti art he saw painted on the trains. He started taking still photographs of the best work he found. One day he met a young person who was also taking pictures. This person told him where the “writers” met to compare notes and talk. He went there to meet them. At first they thought he was a cop, just waiting for a moment to trap them so they could all be arrested. After awhile he started getting calls about where new work was going to turn up. Later, teaming with Tony Silver, they decided on how to approach making the documentary and how to tell the story.

In the film, New York City tries all kinds of methods to stop the writing and to erase it from the inside and outside of the trains. While it seems that there was a lot creative art being done on the sides of the trains, the inside graffiti degenerated into hundreds of tags and gang signs over every inch of the car.  Graffiti writers were at war with each other and writing over each other’s work.

An advertising campaign to dissuade the writers was initiated that tried to make the act socially unacceptable.  The writers already considered themselves as outcasts so that campaign probably didn’t have much effect. Eventually the city resorted to putting up double cyclone fences with razor wire on the top, and dogs patrolling in between the fences to keep the writers out of the train yards. Trains were not parked for more than ten minutes. This along with some commercialization of the graffiti writing art, essencially ended the cycle of “bombing” the trains.

Style Wars, as a documentary has made a significant contribution to the body of knowledge regarding the motivation of these early graffiti writers and the subculture from which they emerged. The work of graffiti writers is now often called “Street Art.” But it’s likely that the current “street artists,” are driven by the same needs as the “writers” back in the day.

This documentary is well directed, shot, edited; both entertaining and informative. It tells a story and at the same time explores social, cultural and anthropological issues. It also provides a historical look at the roots of modern graffiti and street art around the world.

JRMartin

_____________________________________________________

TRAILER

NADJA SALERNO–SONNENBERG SPEAKING IN STRINGS -- Fragmented Glimpses Into The World Of A Famous Violinist

Saturday, December 25th, 2010

One difficult thing about making a portrait or profile documentary is turning it into an interesting story about the person or subject being documented.  Nadja Salerno–Sonnenberg is an extremely talented, and accomplished violinist. Her style of performance is aggressive and filled with the emotion she feels coming from the music. Her approach to performing is somewhat controversial. This sounds like someone you want to know more about. Certainly a documentary about this talented woman, her life and music should make for an enlightening experience.

Documentaries, like any form of storytelling, must tell a story. A story with a basic concept and beginning, middle and end. The test of a successful documentary is that it takes actuality; structures it in a storytelling format that both informs and at times entertains. There are subjects that are difficult to find entertaining but if you can walk away with a feeling that watching it was a meaningful learning experience, the documentary is successful.

There are moments in Speaking With Strings when Nadja Salerno-Sonnenberg is performing that are captivating. To a fan or anyone who appreciates the violin this may make the film worth watching. There are moments when her witty personality and her vulnerability are felt. There are emotional moments in her life that are glimpsed. Unfortunately all these moments do not add up to a cohesive story. There’s a superficial quality to the entire documentary, as if the real Nadja Salerno-Sonnenberg is not being revealed.

Directed by Paola Di Florio, a childhood friend, this film focuses an assemblage of clips of Salerno-Sonnenberg’s apparently dysfunctional life. You have to wonder how much of a friend, Di Florio, really is? After some photographs of Nadja, with voiceover comments about some vague problems with a gun; the documentary opens with Nadja in a hot air balloon telling us she believes in God! This is followed by some performance shots with some voice over. Then suddenly, there’s a shot of Nadja standing behind a tree, maybe waiting for a cue to walk out, which she does. She assembles some found objects in a field, then makes-up some funny faux symbolism about the parts. This scene comes off as contrived and meaningless.

A documentary portrait obviously must look at the entire person, for better or worse, but what is most interesting about a virtuoso violinist is her music. Nadja’s passion for music and the violin is apparent but not really dealt with in a way that goes beyond close-ups of her contorting her face as she plays. Where do those expressions come from? What does she feel about what she is playing at those moments? Pain? Joy? Fear? Agony? All of the above?

This documentary doesn’t appear to have a focus. It tries to create anticipation regarding Nadja’s suicide attempt but this comes-off as a “device” that trivializes her bouts with depression and her suicide attempt. It’s almost as if Di Florio tried to make Nadja appear as a spoiled diva.

There’s nothing wrong with a documentary having drama that stems from actuality and that fits into the story. When watching a documentary about a violinist like Salerno-Sonnenberg, what are you most interested in? Her work? Her creativity? How she got to where she is now? What’s unique about her style of playing? Discovering her personality and life behind the scenes?  Seeing and hearing her perform? There are bits and pieces, fragments that address these issues patched together in this film, but they do not tell a story. What is it you are supposed to learn from these random clips of Nadja Salerno-Sonnenberg’s activities?

In Speaking With Strings there seems to be a focus on everything dysfunctional with clips of performance edited in between interviews. Once in awhile Nadja’s humor, dedication to her craft, work ethic, and personality are revealed ,but ultimately drowned out by lack of context. Nadja Salerno-Sonnenberg’s “life story” would have made a great documentary but Speaking In Strings, is a documentary that is  “Speaking In Tongues,” that are difficult to comprehend.

There are times when the film appears ready to end but doesn’t. Maybe, the director Di Florio, should have considered structuring the documentary narrative along the lines of some of the compositions Nadja performs. A beginning, middle and end with movements that tell us a story that truly speaks to us. Instead the end of the movie is all about her attempted suicide as if that is the climax to her accomlishments.  Was the making of the documentary one big therapy session for Nadja to resolve this crisis in her life? Perhaps she now knows how she got to that point and where she wants to go, but this information is not shared with the audience.

Nadja Salerno-Sonneberg life experience and music must have a lot more to offer than what was portrayed in Speaking In Strings.

JRMartin

_________________________________________________

Trailer not available at this time.


RIDING GIANTS - AN EXCITING EXPLORATION AND HISTORY OF BIG WAVE SURFING

Sunday, December 19th, 2010

Whether you love surfing or wonder what its all about Riding Giants takes you on an amazing journey. Huge waves, accompanied by the sound of the ocean and music, curl across the screen transporting you into the realm of big wave surfing. Here you meet surfing legends past and present including Tom Blake, Greg Noll, Jeff Clark and others who were there in the 1950’s and 60’s; then on to the present with Laird Hamilton.   This is not “just another surfing movie.” Stacy Peralta has a created a documentary that is historical, informative and visually entertaining. It’s a story told from the inside looking out.

Riding Giants looks at the history of big wave surfing beginning with its thousand-year old roots in Hawaii. A short, humorous graphic summary updates you on the first thousand years, beginning on the beaches of Hawaii where Calvinist missionaries banned the indigenous sport for many years until an entrepreneurial promoter came along. He saw the potential to attract tourists, and resurrected the pastime.

Riding Giants includes archival footage, shot by surfers in the early days, that captures the “surfing lifestyle” of the young men who trekked to Hawaii in search of big waves.  The footage is edited with music, effects, interviews with knowledgeable experts, and the surfers themselves. The documentary gives you the feeling you have traveled back in time to the California beaches where modern American surfing culture blossomed.

But the real story of big wave surfing begins with the migration of surfers to Makaha beach on the North Shore in Hawaii, where once again Peralta introduces unique archival photographs and footage shot by Greg Noll and others.  A great deal of research and effort went into locating individuals who had photographs and film of the fifties and sixties in Hawaii.

The use of  film and photographs shot by the people who were there  is important because it establishes and documents surfing subculture in a first person context. This brings aspects of the  direct cinema, “fly-on-the-wall” style of documentary storytelling to the film. In addition the restored film footage has a tactile feel that seems appropriate aesthetically.  Riding Giants is definitely not Gidget’s or Frankie Avalon’s Hollywood version of surfing. It’s interesting to note that much of this early footage appears to have been shot on small 16 millimeter or 8 millimeter film cameras of the day. Once again attesting to how lightweight portable recording equipment facilitated modern documentary filmmaking.

In many ways the editing and pacing of Riding Giants matches the rhythm and movement of the ocean. There’s wave after wave of action as new beaches with bigger waves are discovered and brief moments of calm when you hear from those who have actually ridden the big waves. The thrill of riding a twenty-five foot wave at Waimea Bay on the North Shore in Hawaii is a shared experience.  Riding Giants uses music, effects, interviews and narration in an inventive fashion bringing the existence and emotions experienced by the surfers to the screen. Peralta employs time appropriate music for each period of history and original music by Matter for the score. Effects like waves and the ocean ambience complement the track.

Leaving Hawaii for a time, Riding Giants travels back to Northern California and a surfing location known as Mavericks at Half Moon Bay, twenty miles from San Francisco. Jeff Clark, then a local resident, discovered Mavericks when he was a teenager. This amazing big wave beach has waves that break a half-mile off shore then sweep along until they crash on dangerous jagged rocks. It becomes clear in these scenes that surfing is not just about riding big waves. It’s also about the challenge of conquering the elements and achieving your personal best. Some of the pros and cons regarding using a leash while surfing are looked at in this sequence.

The final scenes of the film look at the challenges and career of Laird Hamilton as he takes on bigger waves, using new and creative methods to get to where the big waves break. The giant waves encountered in this spectacular footage bring you up to date on the current trends in big wave surfing including retrieving the surfers.

Riding Giants is a documentary exploration of big wave surfing, as a sport and/or a pastime. It shows that surfing can be addictive for a number of reasons. In some cases it may be the thrill of conquering and riding a wave. At other times being one with nature may be the attraction. For some it’s a way of life. Whatever the motivation might be, Riding Giants opens up that universe from a historical and cultural perspective while also presenting great entertainment. Stay ‘till the end, watch all the credits and wait for a few last words from Greg Noll.

JRMartin – Author Create Documentary Films, Videos and Multimedia

Theatrical Trailer

THE LAST WALTZ - THE BAND - SCORSESE

Sunday, December 12th, 2010

Asked about working on The Last Waltz, Martin Scorsese said, “it was a joy, it was celebration, it was extraordinary inspiration listening to this music.” To many there will never be another band like “THE BAND!” In 1976 Scorsese was asked to make a documentary of The Band’s last performance.

After 16 years of backing names like Bobby Dylan, and performing on their own The Band was set to do their last concert.  THE LAST WALTZ concert could have been simply an event documentary, or an archival recording of the actual concert. But once Martin Scorsese became involved it became much more.

The Last Waltz is one of the best concert or musical documentaries ever made.   It became a musical documentary when it went beyond simply recording the performance. The Last Waltz transcends the concert event category by inter-cutting interviews with the members of the band talking about their experiences and why after “sixteen years on the road,” Robbie Robertson feels “it’s an impossible way of life.” The interview segments are skillfully blended with the performance footage to give you a sense of how these musicians got to this point in their careers. In dramatic terms, it is the back-story to The Last Waltz documentary.

One of the highlights of the film are the guest appearances of a host of well know musicians and singers including Ronnie Hawkins, DR. John, Neil Young, The Staples, Neil Diamond, Joni Mitchell, Paul Butterfield, Muddy Waters, Erik Clapton, Emmylou Harris, Van Morrison, Bob Dylan, Ringo Starr and Ron Wood of the Rolling Stones. All looking thirty-four years younger then they would today!

There’s an intimate feel to the entire affair. A family of musicians and friends who have come together to celebrate Rock and Roll, their own music and this last concert of The Band. Many of these musicians worked with The Band on the road.  The Band worked with Bobby Dylan when he made the transition from folk music to rock. The camaraderie these musicians share is typified when the guest performers come on stage at the end of the show, to sing Bob Dylan’s “I shall be released” together.

Best known for Taxi Driver, at this point in his career, Scorsese had also made a couple documentary films, Street Scene in 1970 and Italian American in 1974. Scorsese decided that he wanted to shoot this concert in 35mm, “like a movie.” To move the production beyond simply recording archival footage, he brought in Art Director Boris Levin to create a set for the Winterland concert hall in San Francisco.  In order to bring Levin’s designs to life Scorsese borrowed the set from La Traviata including three large chandeliers that were hung over the stage. The entire venue became a set with lighting and a distinct look and feel.  Robbie Robertson says that when the lights came up that night there was an audible gasp from the packed hall.

The Last Waltz is beautifully lit and shot.  Credit for the lighting and cinematography goes to a large number of individuals. Director of Photography/Camera Operators included Vilmos Zsigmon, Laslo Kovacs, David Myers,  Bobby Byrne, Michale Watkins, Hiro Narita, and Camera Operators Fred Schuler, Joe Marquette, Ray J. DelaMtte and Sean Doyle. In one scene Laslo Kovacs saved the day by shooting and covering the performance of Muddy Waters while everyone else had accidentally gone on break. David Myers did handheld camera on the stage and is responsible for some great close-ups during the performances. Hiro Narita on a jib or track getting higher angles.

The subjective layer of sets and lighting adds the filmmaker’s point-of-view to documentary. It helps to interpret the event. Scorsese did not tell the performers what to play or how to work. He shot the concert as it happened. He did do elaborate preproduction planning about how he and his crew would cover the performances based on what numbers The Band said they would perform. Scorsese did a multi-column  shooting script with a storyboard and camera plot diagrams included, so that all the camera operators would know what to shoot. In addition to the concert hall venue Scorsese shot several additional numbers on a stage after the event. In these he was able to use a crane to get a different perspective and feel to the music and performers. Lighting felt as though it was done to complement the Winterland lighting.

The line between fiction and actuality is often a gray one. Scorsese’s introduction of a set and subjective lighting doesn’t add a fictional aspect to the documentary. It simply enhances environment in which the actuality of the concert occurs, helping to illuminate the subject.

The Last Waltz, directed by Martin Scorsese, is a documentary that is more than nostalgic archival concert footage and interviews. For those who lived through those years it is a journey back to a unique time. To other generations it is an entertaining musical history documentary that, as the opening graphic suggests, should be “PLAYED LOUD!”

JRMartin, Author Create Documentary Films, Videos and Multimedia

________________________________________________________

THE FOG OF WAR - ELEVEN LESSONS FROM THE LIFE OF ROBERT S MCNAMARA

Monday, December 6th, 2010

The Fog Of War – Eleven Lessons From The Life Of Robert S. McNamara is more than lessons about the cruelty of war. McNamara and director Errol Morris explore issues surrounding war, including the mindset, ethics, politics and mistakes made in US policy decisions during the life of Robert S. McNamara. The documentary begins with a montage of war scenes and film credits, set to original music by Philip Glass. Soon Robert S. McNamara, former Secretary of Defense, under President Kennedy and President Johnson, is seen sitting in what appears to be a sound recording booth talking to Errol Morris who is heard off camera conducting the conversation.  What follows is an amazing, insightful story built around the life experience of McNamara, who was born in San Francisco, California at the end of the first World War.

McNarmara, at eighty-five, “remembers the sentence where he left off,” as he apparently resumes the interview/conversation, after first asking Morris for a sound check of Morris’s voice. Secretary McNamara definitely wants to be in charge and states he “knows exactly what I [he] wanted to say.” What he has to say is important and comes from a lifetime of learning and experience. It is well worth hearing this first hand account of recent history and what this man has experienced and learned.

In this Academy Award wining documentary, director Errol Morris, with help of editors Karen Schmeer, Doug Abel and Chyld King, takes this intimate conversation and brings it to life with archival footage, effects and music that complements McNamara’s story. In what serves as an introduction to the eleven lessons, McNamara states that he is “at an age where can look back and derive some conclusions about my actions. My rule has been, try to learn, try to understand what happened, develop the lessons and pass them on…” The documentary is structured in such away that McNamara is able to convey insight in to the areas he has experienced and learned from.

McNamara includes information about his career, personal history and controversial background. As the documentary progresses McNamara ties in his past to events that influenced him. This gives you a sense of who he is and what he has experienced to bring him to these conclusions. Morris uses the conversation with McNamara to narrate the documentary. Talking to Morris, McNamara looks directly at the camera. On several of occasions we hear an exchange or question between Morris and McNamara.

Lesson # 1: Empathize with your enemy, deals with the Cuban missile crisis of October, 1962, revealing how close the US was to nuclear war and how war was avoided by understanding the Russian, Cuban and US mindset. How close the US came to war with Russia is dramatically portrayed, as only someone who was there, in the war, room could tell it.

Unlike other films by Errol Morris this film stays in the nonfiction documentary category with no reenactments. It is dramatic and informative using McNamara’s words and extensive use of strong archival footage.  In some ways this is similar to the style Ken Burns uses in his documentaries. But Morris uses music more dramatically and editorially than Burns, bringing out some of the tension inherent in the archival footage and McNamara’s voice over. In addition to McNamara, dialog from individuals heard in the archival footage is used. For example audio conversations between John F. Kennedy and his advisors is used during the Cuban Missile Crisis sequences. Later, during the Viet Nam War, Lyndon Johnson is heard in a number of taped recordings.

Each lesson is another exploration of the history of the US up to the Viet Nam war and McNamara’s departure as Secretary of Defense under President Johnson. There are also reflections by McNamara on the first and second World Wars, and Korea. The subjective point-of view is McNamara’s but it appears to be considered and reflective in a very forthcoming fashion. Beyond the documentation of war McNamara talks about the moral and ethical considerations he and others have faced. He examines the resulting mistakes made based on misinformation and wrong thinking. McNamara originated the idea of “Policy Analysis in his role as Secretary of Defense.

The Fog Of War, as a documentary is significant from a historical, political,  cultural and educational perspective.  This documentary may offer support for the notion that those who do not learn from the past are doomed to repeat the same mistakes over and over.

Robert S. McNamara – June 9, 1916 – July 6, 2009

JRMartin

__________________________________________

THEATRICAL TRAILER

  • Follow Us

    Subscribe to my feed
    Subscribe to my feed
    Subscribe to my feed
    Subscribe to my feed
    Subscribe to my feed
    Subscribe to my feed
  • Resources